ARMA, S.R.O. v. BAE SYSTEMS OVERSEAS, INC.

Petitioner: ARMA, S.R.O.
Respondent: BAE SYSTEMS OVERSEAS, INC.
Case Number: 1:2013cv00494
Filed: April 11, 2013
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: James E. Boasberg
Nature of Suit: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09:0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 21, 2013 20 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding 19 ORDER. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 8/21/2013. (lcjeb3)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ARMA, S.R.O. v. BAE SYSTEMS OVERSEAS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ARMA, S.R.O.
Represented By: Jonathan M. Cader
Represented By: Andrew P. Cooper
Represented By: Joshua D. Wolson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BAE SYSTEMS OVERSEAS, INC.
Represented By: Alan Scott Bolden
Represented By: Lawrence S. Sher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?