MOUNTAIN STATES HEALTH ALLIANCE v. SEBELIUS
| MOUNTAIN STATES HEALTH ALLIANCE |
| KATHLEEN SEBELIUS |
| 1:2013cv00641 |
| May 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Emmet G. Sullivan |
| Contract: Recovery Medicare |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on September 10, 2015. (lcrdm1, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MOUNTAIN STATES HEALTH ALLIANCE v. SEBELIUS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MOUNTAIN STATES HEALTH ALLIANCE | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Nolan Etzel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
