CANNING et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
| GEORGE CANNING and JEFFREY STEINBERG |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE |
| 1:2013cv00831 |
| June 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 88888 |
| Emmet G. Sullivan |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
MEMORANDUM OPINION: The Court will GRANT Defendant's motion for summary judgment, Dkt. 88 , and will DENY Plaintiffs' motions for summary judgment, Dkt. 86 , Dkt. 90 . A separate order will issue. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 4/8/20. (lcrdm3, )
|
|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant's motion for summary judgment, Dkt. 74 , is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and the Canning Plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment, Dkt. 79 , is hereby DENIED. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 10/24/2018. (lcrdm1, )
|
|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 19 ; granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 23 ; denying Plaintiffs' Second Motion For Partial Summary Judgment 35 and Motions For In Camera Review 22 36 . Defendant is directed to supplement the record within 60 days. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on September 30, 2015. (lcrdm1, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
