BURNS v. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER et al
| JANE DOE |
| GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and MATTHEW D. LEVY |
| 1:2013cv00898 |
| June 6, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 88888 |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on December 2, 2019. (lccck1)
|
|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on March 14, 2019. (lcckk1)
|
|
Filing
81
MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 80 Order on motions for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 8/12/2016. (lcckk2)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER DENYING Defendants' 45 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Second Expert Report and Preclude Related Testimony; GRANTING Plaintiff's 44 Motion for Leave to Supplement Initial Disclosures to Add Additional Witn esses; GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART Defendants' 46 Motion to Compel Deposition Testimony Pursuant to Rule 37(a)(3)(B)(i); allowing additional limited discovery as specified herein; and requiring the parties to file a Joint Supplemental Discovery Plan by no later than JUNE 12, 2015. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 5/28/2015. (lcckk2)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
