ROYAL OAK ENTERPRISES, LLC v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Plaintiff: ROYAL OAK ENTERPRISES, LLC
Defendant: PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Case Number: 1:2013cv01040
Filed: July 9, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Gladys Kessler
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION to the Order on the Motions for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Gladys Kessler on 1/28/15. (CL, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ROYAL OAK ENTERPRISES, LLC v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROYAL OAK ENTERPRISES, LLC
Represented By: Natasha S. Fedder
Represented By: Michael Joseph Prame
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?