SCOTT et al v. PACIFIC ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS (PAE), INC.
PATRICIA SCOTT and JOHN L. TUDBURY |
PACIFIC ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS (PAE), INC. |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
1:2013cv01844 |
November 20, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
11001 |
Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
Other Statutory Actions |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on January 15, 2020. (lccck1) |
Filing 62 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court shall, in an exercise of its discretion, GRANT Relators' 52 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint to File Correction or in the Alternative for Extension of Time to Respond to the Motion to Dismiss. The Cl erk of Court shall file Relators' [52-1] Fourth Amended Complaint as of this date. In light of the filing of Relators' Fourth Amended Complaint, the Court shall DENY WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendant's 50 Motion to Dismiss the Third Amende d Complaint. Because the Court permits the Fourth Amended Complaint on the basis of Relators' 50 Motion, the Court shall GRANT-IN-PART and DENY-IN-PART as MOOT Relators' 59 Motion to Docket Their Fourth Amended Complaint and to Amend t he Schedule. Relators' 59 Motion is granted only insofar as the Court adopts the briefing schedule proposed therein for any dispositive motion that Defendant may choose to file. Defendant may file a Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complai nt by OCTOBER 15, 2018. If Defendant so files, then Relators shall file their response by NOVEMBER 14, 2018. Defendant's reply, if any, shall be filed by NOVEMBER 28, 2018. See Memorandum Opinion and Order for further details. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on September 13, 2018. (lcckk1) |
Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The 33 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 9/13/2017. (lcckk1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.