SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. HAMILTON PARK HEALTH CARE CENTER, LTD et al
| SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, STEPHEN ABRECHT, RODERICK S. BASHIR, KEVIN J. DOYLE, MYRIAM ESCAMILLA, DAVID A. STILWELL, CHRISTOPHER BOUVIER, STEVEN FORD, EDWARD J. MANKO, FRANK A. MAXSON and JOHN J. SHERIDAN |
| HAMILTON PARK HEALTH CARE CENTER, LTD, HAMILTON PARK OPCO, LLC and ALARIS HEALTH, LLC |
| 1:2014cv00084 |
| January 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| John D. Bates |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 42 plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. See text for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 1/14/2016.(lcjdb2)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER conditionally granting defendants Hamilton Park OPCO, LLC, and Alaris Health, LLC's motion for vacatur of default; denying plaintiffs' motion for default judgment as to those same defendants; granting leave to file those same defendants' proposed answer to plaintiffs' complaint; setting an initial scheduling conference; and requiring additional briefing. See text for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 6/6/14. (lcjdb2)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
