SOTO, et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
||MAURICIO ROJAS SOTO, AMALIA SIERRA CORREAL, NATHALIA ROJAS SIERRA and ISABELLA ROJAS SIERRA
||UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE
||April 13, 2014
||US District Court for the District of Columbia
||Washington, DC Office
||Rosemary M. Collyer
|Nature of Suit:
||Freedom of Information Act
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 25, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION denying Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a second amended complaint 38 . See attached document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 3/25/2017. (lcrdm2, ) Modified on 3/27/2017 (kt).
|June 17, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION: For the reasons set out in this Memorandum Opinion, the Court will grant the Department's motion for summary judgment, deny the plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration, and deny the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. The Court will delay the entry of judgment in this case for two weeks, until July 1, 2016. See Memorandum Opinion for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 6/17/2016. (lcrdm2, )
|August 6, 2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 12 and DENYING Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment 15 . It is further ORDERED that on or before August 28, 2015, the Department shall file an additional affidavit providing further detail as to whether each document pertains to the issuance, denial, or revocation of a visa. See Order for Details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 8/6/2015. (lcrdm2, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?