GRAY v. STALEY et al
LINWOOD GRAY |
HARRY L. STALEY, ANNIS ALSTON STALEY and JOANN HARTLEY STALEY |
1:2014cv00937 |
May 28, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
88888 |
Beryl A. Howell |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 55 Motion for Relief from Judgment. See the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 04/04/2017. (lcapm1) |
Filing 51 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 44 USCA Order remanding the case. See the attached Memorandum Opinion for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 12/15/2016. (lcapm1) |
Filing 43 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER modifying 41 the court's Order of October 22, 2015. See attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for further details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 05/09/2016. (lcapm1) |
Filing 40 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 34 and 35 Plaintiffs Motions to Alter or Amend Judgment. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 10/22/2015. (lcapm1) |
Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 6 , 10 , and 13 Plaintiff's Motions for Default Judgment; 8 Defendants' Motion to Vacate Clerk's Entry of Default; 11 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; 24 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend; 25 Plaintiff's Motion Pursuant to Rule 11(c)(3); and 28 Plaintiff's Motion to Take Judicial Notice. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 08/10/2015. (lcapm1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.