HOWARD v. LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC. et al
| LEONARD HOWARD |
| LIQUIDITY SERVICES, INC., WILLIAM P. ANGRICK , III, JAMES M. RALLO and KATHRYN A. DOMINO |
| 1:2014cv01183 |
| July 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Beryl A. Howell |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
130
MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding Class Representatives' 120 Unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Plan of Allocation and Class Counsel's 121 Motion for an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Payment of Litigation Expenses. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on October 5, 2018. (lcbah4)
|
|
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding the plaintiffs' 64 Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Representatives and Class Counsel; the defendants' 83 Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Reliance by Co-Lead Plaintiffs; an d the plaintiffs' 94 Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply in Response to Defendants' Reply in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Reliance by Lead Plaintiffs. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on September 6, 2017. (lcbah1)
|
|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding the defendants' 40 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on March 31, 2016. (lcbah1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
