STEELE, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BRITTANY MONTROIS and ADAM STEELE |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
1:2014cv01523 |
September 8, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
11001 |
Tanya S. Chutkan |
Other Statutory Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 0706 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 248 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: Motion 229 for Judgment and Motion 230 to Clarify. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 09/25/2023. (lcrcl3) |
Filing 226 UNSEALED MEMORANDUM OPINION re Motion 173 for Partial Summary Judgment and Motion 175 for Summary Judgment (originally filed under seal at 221 ). Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 01/23/2023 (unsealed 02/21/2023). (lcrcl3) |
Filing 214 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 7/19/2022. (lcrcl3) |
Filing 145 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 12/4/2020. (lcrcl3) |
Filing 95 MEMORANDUM OPINION re Order 94 . Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 12/18/17. (lsj) |
Filing 78 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re United States' Motion 66 for Partial Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Motion 67 for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 6/1/17. (lsj) |
Filing 64 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on August 8, 2016.(lcrcl3) |
Filing 55 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on February 9, 2016.(lcrcl3) |
Filing 37 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 6/30/2015. (hs) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.