NYAMBAL v. ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff: EUGENE NYAMBAL
Defendant: ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES, LLC
Case Number: 1:2014cv01904
Filed: November 12, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: James E. Boasberg
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on 10/17/2018. (lcegs3)
January 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on January 26, 2016. (lcegs4)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NYAMBAL v. ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EUGENE NYAMBAL
Represented By: John M. Shoreman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES, LLC
Represented By: Edward Clark Bacon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?