SHAW v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff: JUSTINA SHAW
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case Number: 1:2015cv00927
Filed: June 16, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Royce C. Lamberth
Presiding Judge: Deborah A. Robinson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 20:1401
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re ORDER 29 granting 25 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 5/15/17. (lsj)
September 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 9/28/2016. (tg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SHAW v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JUSTINA SHAW
Represented By: Charles Anthony Moran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Represented By: Tasha Monique Hardy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?