ESTATE OF YONADAV HIRSHFELD et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
| ELISHEVA HIRSHFELD, ZEMACH HIRSHFELD, ELYAKIM HIRSHFELD, SHILO HIRSHFELD, ZIMRAT BRACHA ZUKERMAN, HAYA HAMITAL HACOHEN-NOVICK, YEDIDYA HIRSHFELD, HANA SHANDORFY, DAVID YINON HIRSHFELD, AVIYA FREEDMAN and ESTATE OF YONADAV HIRSHFELD |
| ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN |
| 1:2015cv01082 |
| July 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1605 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM OPINION re: Plaintiffs' 30 Motion for Default Judgment. A separate Order accompanies this Opinion. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 08/30/2018. (DM)
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Plaintiffs' Motion to deem service effective pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1608(a)(4). Defendant is deemed to have been served on April 4, 2017. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 10/10/2017. (DM)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Plaintiffs' 17 Motion for Order Accepting Effectiveness of Service on Defendant Islamic Republic of Iran is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. To the extent Plaintiffs seek to pursue their claims, they shall effectuate service on Defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1608(a). Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on January 25, 2017. (NS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
