DUARTE v. NOLAN
Plaintiff: PAMELA DUARTE
Defendant: MICHAEL EDWARD NOLAN
Case Number: 1:2015cv01396
Filed: August 27, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Christopher R. Cooper
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 23 U.S.C. ยง 134
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER denying 20 Plaintiff's Motion to Alter/Amend Judgment. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS.) Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 7/20/2016. (lccrc2)
May 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 8 Defendant Nolan's Motion to Dismiss, 9 Defendant Helix's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Christopher R. Cooper on 5/17/2016. (lccrc2)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DUARTE v. NOLAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PAMELA DUARTE
Represented By: Phyllis Jane Outlaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL EDWARD NOLAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?