KUMAR KAMMARAYIL et al v. STERLING OPERATIONS, INC. et al
Case Number: 1:2015cv01699
Filed: December 31, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
Nature of Suit: False Claims Act
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING the government's 35 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(c)(2)(A) and DENYING the relators' 36 Motion to Strike 35 Motion to Dismiss and to Substitute a Notice of Dismissal in Its Place. See Memorandum and Order for further details. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on February 6, 2019. (lcbah2)
December 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART the plaintiffs' 24 Motion for Order that the Department of Justice Serve on Relators' Counsel, Under Seal, the Memoranda of Law That Accompanied the Government's Seven Requests for Extensions to Consider Its Election to Intervene and Preserve Records. See Memorandum Opinion and Order for further details. Signed by Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell on December 31, 2018. (lcbah2) Modified document type on 12/31/2018 (tg).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KUMAR KAMMARAYIL et al v. STERLING OPERATIONS, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?