LILLEMOE et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE et al
| BRETT LILLEMOE and GTR, LLC |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, PHILLIP MARK ROWSE and JONATHAN L. DOSTER |
| 1:2015cv02047 |
| November 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Tanya S. Chutkan |
| Agricultural Acts |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding defendant's 90 Renewed Partial Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing; the defendant's 89 Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment; the plaintiffs' 94 Motion for Discovery; and the defendant's 100 Motion for Protective Order. See text for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on April 27, 2020. (lcdlf3)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER denying the plaintiffs' 54 Motion for Discovery without prejudice; denying the defendant's 59 Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice; and denying the defendant's 60 Motion for Protective Order. See text for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on September 30, 2019. (lcdlf3)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding the defendants' 30 Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. See order for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on September 25, 2018. (lcdlf1) Modified on 9/26/2018 to reflect correct document type. (zjl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
