PATZY v. HOCHBERG
Plaintiff: RODRIGO PATZY
Defendant: FRED P. HOCHBERG
Case Number: 1:2016cv00507
Filed: March 16, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Rosemary M. Collyer
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 2/12/2019. (lcrmc3)
July 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER denying 17 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 07/20/2017. (lcrmc3)
November 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION. Signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 11/9/2016. (lcrmc3)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PATZY v. HOCHBERG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RODRIGO PATZY
Represented By: James R. Klimaski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FRED P. HOCHBERG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?