RAY v. MURPHY
| RAY and GEOFFREY D. RAY |
| MURPHY and PATRICK J. MURPHY |
| 1:2016cv00726 |
| April 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Amit P Mehta |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement by PATRICK J. MURPHY (Grace, Derrick) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Answer or other response to Complaint due by 9/26/2016. (cdw) |
| Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise responde by PATRICK J. MURPHY (Grace, Derrick) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #12 Consent Motion for Enlargement of Time. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before September 26, 2016. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 08/23/2016. (lcapm3)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Answer or other response to Complaint due by 8/24/2016. (cdw) |
| Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise respond by PATRICK J. MURPHY (Grace, Derrick) |
|
MINUTE ORDER granting #11 Consent Motion for Enlargement of Time. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint no later than August 24, 2016. Signed by Judge Amit P Mehta on 07/19/2016. (lcapm3)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Answer to complaint due by 7/25/2016. (cdw) |
|
MINUTE ORDER granting #10 Consent Motion for Enlargement of Time. Defendant shall file its answer or response to Plaintiff's Complaint no later than July 25, 2016. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 06/24/2016. (lcapm3)
|
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise resond by PATRICK J. MURPHY (Grace, Derrick) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Derrick Wayne Grace on behalf of PATRICK J. MURPHY (Grace, Derrick) |
| Filing 8 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 4/26/2016. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 6/25/2016. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(MacKay, Scott) |
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 4/26/2016. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(MacKay, Scott) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. PATRICK J. MURPHY served on 4/25/2016 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(MacKay, Scott) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Consent Forms)(zrdj) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE re #1 Complaint filed by GEOFFREY D. RAY. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by GEOFFREY D. RAY. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(MacKay, Scott) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued Electronically as to PATRICK J. MURPHY. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (md) |
| SUMMONS Not Issued as to U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General (SUMMONS WERE NOT FILED AT THE TIME COMPLAINT WAS FILED) (md) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE re #1 Complaint filed by GEOFFREY D. RAY. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by GEOFFREY D. RAY.(MacKay, Scott) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PATRICK J. MURPHY ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-4490632) filed by GEOFFREY D. RAY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MacKay, Scott) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Amit P. Mehta. (md) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
