BRONNER et al v. DUGGAN et al
| SIMON BRONNER, MICHAEL ROCKLAND, CHARLES D. KUPFER, MICHAEL L. BARTON and THE AMERICAN STUDIES ASSOCIATION |
| LISA DUGGAN, CURTIS MAREZ, AVERY GORDON, NEFERTI TADIAR, SUNAINA MAIRA, CHANDAN REDDY and THE AMERICAN STUDIES ASSOCIATION |
| 1:2016cv00740 |
| April 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
122
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting 106 , 108 , 109 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss; denying as moot 107 , 110 , 111 Defendants' Motions to Stay; denying as moot 35 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying as moot 40 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Surreply. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on February 4, 2019. (lcrc3)
|
|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting 57 Plaintiffs' Amended Motion to Extend Time to Add Parties; granting 59 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint: See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 3/6/2018. (lcrc3)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part 21 Defendants' Renewed Motion to Dismiss. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 3/31/2017. (lcrc2)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
