LAMB v. MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION
Plaintiff: JERRY GORALSKI LAMB
Defendant: MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION and GEORGE W. CHIAMULERA
Case Number: 1:2016cv00765
Filed: April 26, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Randolph D. Moss
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 83 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' motion for summary judgment, Dkt. 75 , and Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment, Dkt. 79 , are DENIED without prejudice. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 08/30/2019. (lcrdm2, )
September 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 73 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' motion for summary judgment, Dkt. 63, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, without prejudice, and Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment, Dkt. 65, is DENIED without prejudice. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 9/24/2018. (lcrdm2, )
January 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiffs motion for leave to amend his complaint 41 is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint including counts One, Two, Seven, Nine, Ten, Eleven, and Thirteen of t he proposed amended complaint [41-1], as well as count Six except to the extent that it alleges Privacy Act (as opposed to due process) claims; the remaining counts of the proposed amended complaint would be futile and plaintiff may not file them in the second amended complaint. Plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel 27 is hereby DENIED. His motions for summary judgment 21 , 22 are hereby DENIED. His motion for entry of a default judgment and to strike the Cohen declaration 43 is hereby DENIED. Defendant George Chiamuleras motion to dismiss 11 is hereby GRANTED. Defendant the Millennium Challenge Corporations motion for summary judgment 17 is hereby DENIED. The Court will sua sponte dismiss counts Two and Three of the amended complaint 9 as against the Millennium Challenge Corporation. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff may not file any further motions without first conferring with the opposing parties and, if unable to resolve the issue, scheduling and participating in a pre-motion conference with the Court. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 1/6/2017. (lcrdm2, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LAMB v. MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JERRY GORALSKI LAMB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION
Represented By: Jason Todd Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEORGE W. CHIAMULERA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?