ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND v. HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION
Plaintiff: ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant: HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION
Case Number: 1:2016cv01575
Filed: August 2, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION Regarding 22 Order Granting Plaintiff's 15 Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly on 4/5/2017. (lcckk3)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND v. HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Represented By: Leah Marie Nicholls
Represented By: Tracy Diana Rezvani
Represented By: Kim E. Richman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION
Represented By: Miranda L. Berge
Represented By: E. Desmond Hogan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?