SMITH et al v. CLINTON
| PATRICIA SMITH and CHARLES WOODS |
| HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON |
| 1:2016cv01606 |
| August 8, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Royce C. Lamberth |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE U.S. Attorney General filed by PATRICIA SMITH, CHARLES WOODS.(Klayman, Larry) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR SUMMONS TO ISSUE For U.S. Attorney for District of Columbia filed by PATRICIA SMITH, CHARLES WOODS.(Klayman, Larry) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued Electronically as to HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Consent) (md) |
| SUMMONS Not Issued as to non-party U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General. (md) (SUMMONS WERE NOT FILED AT THE TIME COMPLAINT WAS FILED) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by PATRICIA SMITH, CHARLES WOODS. Case related to Case No. 14-1242. (jf) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Royce C. Lamberth. (md) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-4631106) filed by PATRICIA SMITH, CHARLES WOODS. (Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet, # 3 Notice to Counsel/Party Notice of Related Case)(Klayman, Larry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
