GOLDEN v. MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION et al
| DAVID A. GOLDEN |
| MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION and CHUGACH GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS |
| 1:2016cv01660 |
| August 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 88888 |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM OPINION denying 63 Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement, denying 68 MTC's Request for Fees, and granting 62 MTC's Motion to Extend Discovery Period. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 11/15/19. (lcrc1)
|
|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part 45 , 46 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 08/06/2018. (lcrc1)
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting 22 Defendant Management & Training Corporations Motion to Dismiss; granting 23 Defendant Chugach Government Solutions LLCs Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 26 Plaintiffs Motion For Leave to File Second Amended Complaint; and denying as moot 34 Defendant Chugach Government Solutions LLCs Motion For Leave to File A Surreply: See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 7/21/2017. (lcrc3)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
