WOODRUFF v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Plaintiff: TYRELL WOODRUFF
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Case Number: 1:2016cv01884
Filed: September 20, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Randolph D. Moss
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 82 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons explained in the attached opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Woodruff's motion to amend, Dkt. 72 , is GRANTED. The United States may, however, renew its futility argument in the context of a motion to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint (or, if the government prefers, in a combined motion for judgment on the pleadings and/or for summary judgment, following the close of discovery). See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 3/10/2021. (lcrdm2)
June 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 65 REDACTED MEMORANDUM OPINION: Denying in part and granting in part Defendant's motion to dismiss, Dkt. 53, with redactions as agreed upon by the parties and adopted by the Court, see Dkt. 63; Dkt. 61. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 06/18/2020. (lcrdm2, )
April 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend 23 is hereby DENIED. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 4/23/2018. (lcrdm2, )
September 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Upon consideration of the United States's motion to dismiss 13 , the motion is hereby DENIED as premature. It is further ORDERED that Woodruff may engage in jurisdictional discovery subject to the limitations set f orth in this opinion. It is further ORDERED that (1) discovery shall be completed by December 1, 2017; and (2) the parties shall submit a joint status report on or before January 5, 2018. It is further ORDERED that the Federal Bureau of Prisons is DISMISSED as a defendant in this action. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 9/26/2017. (lcrdm2, )
January 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant's motion to transfer 5 is hereby DENIED. Defendant's motion for an extension of time is hereby GRANTED, and defendant may answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before January 20, 2017. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 1/3/2017. (lcrdm2, ) Modified on 1/4/2017 to change document type from "Order" to "Memorandum Opinion and Order" (kt).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WOODRUFF v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TYRELL WOODRUFF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?