EVANS v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
CARRIE LOU EVANS |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE |
1:2016cv01932 |
September 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
11001 |
Amit P. Mehta |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 5 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 03/02/2017. (lcapm2) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: EVANS v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CARRIE LOU EVANS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE | |
Represented By: | Jason Todd Cohen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.