MOLOCK et al v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC. et al
| MICHAEL MOLOCK and RANDAL KUCZOR |
| WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC. and WHOLE FOODS MARKET GROUP, INC. |
| 1:2016cv02483 |
| December 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Amit P. Mehta |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM OPINION re: Defendant's 37 Motion for Certification for Interlocutory Appeal. See the attached Memorandum Opinion for details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 06/11/2018. (lcapm3)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 30 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' 28 Second Amended Class Action Complaint. See the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 03/15/2018. (lcapm3)
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 24 Motion to Amend the Complaint and denying as moot Defendants' 15 Motion to Dismiss. The Second Amended Complaint is now the operative complaint in this matter. The parties shall mee t and confer and, no later than June 28, 2017, notify the court if Defendants intend to file another motion to dismiss and, if so, propose a briefing schedule. See the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 06/22/2017. (lcapm1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
