IN RE: BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD ANTITRUST LITIGATION (MDL NO. 2406)
| BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD ANTITRUST LITIGATION (MDL NO. 2406) |
| HEALTH CARE COST INSTITUTE, INC. |
| IN RE: BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD ANTITRUST LITIGATION (MDL NO. 2406) |
| 1:2016mc02156 |
| October 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Motion to Quash Subpoenas |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by HEALTH CARE COST INSTITUTE, INC. (Wycoff, Eric) |
| Filing 4 STATUS REPORT by HEALTH CARE COST INSTITUTE, INC.. (Wycoff, Eric) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Status Report due by 1/5/2017 (tj) |
| MINUTE ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that Non-Party Petitioner Health Care Cost Institute, Inc. shall file a status report on or before January 5, 2017. (So Ordered Judge Rudolph Contreras on 12/21/2016). (lcrc3) |
| Filing 3 Case randomly reassigned to Judge Rudolph Contreras. Judge Tanya S. Chutkan no longer assigned to the case. (ztnr) |
| Filing 2 LCvR 7.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by HEALTH CARE COST INSTITUTE, INC. (td) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Quash Subpoena Served by Provider Plaintiffs by HEALTH CARE COST INSTITUTE, INC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(td) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
