VASQUEZ et al v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC. et al
| VICTOR VASQUEZ, NADEEM SHEIKH, KATIA SADOUDI, SVETLANA BAUTISTA, IBRAHIMA BA, NICHOLAS MIANO, PA M NJIE, MICHAEL AMEGNAGLO and DAVID BERGER |
| WHOLE FOODS MARKET, INC., WHOLE FOODS MARKET GROUP, INC., BROOKE BUCHANAN and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10 |
| 1:2017cv00112 |
| January 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Amit P. Mehta |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
217
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Defendants' 190 Motion to Strike, denying Plaintiffs' 198 Motion to Strike, and denying in part Defendants' 175 Motion for Summary Judgment. See attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 3/28/2023. (lcapm2)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 12 Motion to Dismiss, granting Plaintiffs' 16 Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint, and denying as moot Defendants' 21 Motion to Stay. The Second Amended Complaint is now the operative pleading in this matter. Defendants may move to dismiss the new claim on or before February 23, 2018, unless additional time is requested. See the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 02/09/2018. (lcapm3)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
