ROSENBERG et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
| CAROL ROSENBERG and MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE |
| 1:2017cv00437 |
| March 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Amit P. Mehta |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 31 Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs' 34 Motion for Summary Judgment and Partial Reconsideration. The parties are directed to meet and confer and file a Joint Status Report by March 12, 2020, updating the court on whether any further litigation is required. See the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta 3/5/2020. (lcapm1).
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 18 Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs' 19 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties shall meet and confer and no later than October 10, 2018, propose a schedule for an additional round of summary judgment briefing. See the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 09/27/2018. (lcapm3)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
