CALDERON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
NIDIA R. CALDERON |
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, BRICHER and DASILVA |
1:2017cv00494 |
March 17, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
11001 |
Colleen Kollar-Kotelly |
Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment, Dkt. 42 . A separate order will issue. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 09/20/2019. (lcrdm2, ) |
Filing 40 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Upon consideration of Defendant's motion to dismiss, Dkt. 36 , it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's motion is GRANTED. The Court will DISMISS Plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend within 30 days. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint on or before February 4, 2019, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 1/3/2019. (lcrdm2, ) |
Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's renewed motion to dismiss, 22 is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that the parties are to meet and confer and to file a joint status report on or before September 7, 2018; and further ORDERED that the parties are to appear for a status conference on September 14, 2018, at 11:30 am in Courtroom 21. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 8/22/2018. (lcrdm2, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.