SEVIER v. LOWENTHAL et al
Plaintiff: CHRIS SEVIER
Defendant: ALAN LOWENTHAL, SUSAN DAVIS, DONALD S. BEYER and EARL BLUMENAUER
Case Number: 1:2017cv00570
Filed: March 23, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Randolph D. Moss
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Dkt. 51 , it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss, Dkt. 8 , is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the motion to intervene, Dkt. 5 , is DENIED; and it i s further ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint, Dkt. 25 , is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to file an overlength reply in support of the motion to amend the Complaint, Dkt. 30 , is GRANTED; an d it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to file an overlength surreply to the motion to dismiss, Dkt. 32 , is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that the motions for summary judgment filed by the proposed intervenors, Dkt. 34 ; Dkt. [47 ], are DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for a scheduling conference, Dkt. 36 , is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to strike, Dkt. 40 , is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiff& #039;s motions to supplement, Dkt. 41 ; Dkt. 46 , are DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that the motions for leave to file amicus briefs filed by the National Alliance of Black Pastors, Dkt. 48 , and Coalition of Doctors Defending Reparative Therapy, Dkt. 49 , are GRANTED and that the briefs shall be deemed FILED; and it is further ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 3/26/18. (lcrdm3, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SEVIER v. LOWENTHAL et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHRIS SEVIER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALAN LOWENTHAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SUSAN DAVIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DONALD S. BEYER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EARL BLUMENAUER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?