NATIONAL INDUSTRIES FOR THE BLIND et al v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
Plaintiff: NATIONAL INDUSTRIES FOR THE BLIND, BOSMA INDUSTRIES FOR THE BLIND, INC. and WINSTON-SALEM INDUSTRIES FOR THE BLIND, INC.
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, DAVID J. SHULKIN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Movant: PDS CONSULTANTS, INC.
Case Number: 1:2017cv00992
Filed: May 24, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Ketanji Brown Jackson
Nature of Suit: Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0706
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Defendants' 20 Motion to Stay Proceedings, and instructing Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' 1 25 complaints on or before 11/23/2017. See attached document for details. Signed by Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on November 7, 2017. (lckbj3)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NATIONAL INDUSTRIES FOR THE BLIND et al v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NATIONAL INDUSTRIES FOR THE BLIND
Represented By: Stephen J. Obermeier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BOSMA INDUSTRIES FOR THE BLIND, INC.
Represented By: Stephen J. Obermeier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WINSTON-SALEM INDUSTRIES FOR THE BLIND, INC.
Represented By: Stephen J. Obermeier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Represented By: Peter T. Wechsler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID J. SHULKIN
Represented By: Peter T. Wechsler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Peter T. Wechsler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: PDS CONSULTANTS, INC.
Represented By: Keeley Allison McCarty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?