HUDSON, JR. v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
Plaintiff: EUGENE HUDSON, JR.
Defendant: AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
Case Number: 1:2017cv01447
Filed: July 20, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: James E. Boasberg
Nature of Suit: Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 0187
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 8 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 9/27/2017. (lcjeb2)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HUDSON, JR. v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
Represented By: Gony Frieder Goldberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EUGENE HUDSON, JR.
Represented By: Jonathan G. Axelrod
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?