KIRWA et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
| MAHLON KIRWA, SANTHOSH MEENHALLIMATH and ASHOK VISWANATHAN |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and JAMES MATTIS |
| 1:2017cv01793 |
| September 1, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 88888 |
| Ellen S. Huvelle |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
254
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting the parties' 251 Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Regarding Plaintiffs' Claims for Equal Access to Justice Act Attorneys' Fees and Costs. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on January 18, 2022. (lcnr)
|
|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 83 Motion to Clarify: See MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER for details. Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on May 23, 2018. (lcesh1) Modified on 5/24/2018, to change document type to Opinion (gdf).
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM OPINION supporting ORDER granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion to Dismiss; denying 39 Motion for Summary Judgment: See ORDER and OPINION for details. Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on January 11, 2018. (lcesh1)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction, ECF No. 11 , and provisionally certifying a class. See MEMORANDUM OPINION and accompanying ORDER, ECF No. 28 for details. Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on October 25, 2017. (lcesh1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
