LEITNER-WISE v. KONIAG, INC.
Plaintiff: PAUL ANDREW LEITNER-WISE
Defendant: KONIAG, INC.
Case Number: 1:2017cv01859
Filed: September 11, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Amit P. Mehta
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 15 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, 19 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery and to Hold Motion for Summary Judgment in Abeyance, and 26 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 12/13/2018. (lcapm3) (lcapm3, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LEITNER-WISE v. KONIAG, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PAUL ANDREW LEITNER-WISE
Represented By: Matthew August LeFande
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KONIAG, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?