VASQUEZ v. DOE et al
| JOSE T. VASQUEZ |
| JOHN DOE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, TERENCE SUTTON, COUNTY OF WILL, ILLINOIS, CITY OF JOLIET, ILLINOIS, OFFICER COLE, JR., LEROY HOLLINS and JOSEPH SANFORD |
| 1:2017cv02194 |
| October 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 88888 |
| Amit P. Mehta |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 126 Defendant's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, Alternatively, for a New Trial or for Remittitur. Please see the attached Memorandum Opinion for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 3/29/2023. (lcapm2)
|
|
Filing
96
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 85 Motion for Summary Judgment. See the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 09/30/2021. (lcapm3)
|
|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 47 Defendant District of Columbia's Motion to Dismiss. See the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 07/12/2019. (lcapm3)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 32 Defendant District of Columbia's Motion to Dismiss. See attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 11/14/2018. (lcapm3)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
