SHEM-TOV v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
| 1:2017cv02452 |
| May 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| Prisoner Petition: Civil Rights (Other) |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
MEMORANDUM OPINION: For the reasons stated herein, the Court will dismiss this action, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. A separate order will issue. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 11/28/2022. (lcrdm1)
|
|
Filing
71
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant Interpol Washington's motion for summary judgment, Dkt. 63 . See attached document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 03/30/2021. (lcrdm1)
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION granting in part and denying in part Defendants Department of Homeland Security's and Interpol Washington's Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. 34. See document for details. Signed by Judge Randolph D. Moss on 5/25/2020. (lcrdm1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SHEM-TOV v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
