In re DEPOSITION OF MATTHEW A. LEFANDE, ESQ.
DISTRICT TITLE |
1:2017mc02466 |
September 29, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
11001 |
Amy Berman Jackson |
Deborah A. Robinson |
Other Statutory Actions |
Civil Miscellaneous Case |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 130 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Matthew LeFande's 123 objections to the Magistrate Judge's 121 Criminal Contempt Order are OVERRULED. It is FURTHER ORDERED in accordance with the Criminal Contempt Order under 28 U.S.C. § 636(e)(2), Matthew LeFande is summarily punished by a fine in the amount of $5,000.00 payable to the Clerk of Court no later than March 19, 2018. See Memorandum Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 02/26/2018. (lcabj3) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: In re DEPOSITION OF MATTHEW A. LEFANDE, ESQ. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DISTRICT TITLE | |
Represented By: | David Howard Cox |
Represented By: | Brian Wood Thompson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.