KOWAL v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
| BARBARA KOWAL |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY |
| 1:2018cv00938 |
| April 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 88888 |
| Timothy J. Kelly |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM OPINION in support of 61 Order granting Defendants' 55 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying Plaintiff's 58 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 9/2/2022. (lctjk1)
|
|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 36 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying Plaintiff's 41 Motion for Summary Judgment. See order for details. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 8/3/21. (lctjk2)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendants' 20 Motion for Summary Judgment as to the adequacy of the search, denying Plaintiff's 23 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment as to the adequacy of the search, denying without prejudice both motions in all other respects, and ordering the parties to submit a joint schedule for briefing renewed motions by June 15, 2020. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on 6/1/20. (lctjk2)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
