HARRINGTON v. SECRETARY OF STATE
| TESAE HARRINGTON |
| SECRETARY OF STATE and MIKE POMPEO |
| 1:2018cv01056 |
| May 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Tanya S. Chutkan |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: Defendants' 51 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's 49 Motion for Summary Judgment. The court hereby amends its March 1, 2023 Memorandum Opinion to reflect changes in its legal analysis of th e issues presented. The corresponding order is unchanged, and this action remains dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Amended Memorandum Opinion to Plaintiff at her address of record. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 4/14/2023. (lcja)
|
|
Filing
64
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: Defendants' 51 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's 49 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 3/1/2023. (lcja)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION regarding 22 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiff's 37 Motion for Permission to Add an EEO Charge, 38 Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Memorandum, and 39 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 9/30/2020. (lcsd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
