BENOIT v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
| JACQUES BENOIT and CAMILLE COLLETTE |
| DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
| 1:2018cv01104 |
| May 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Rudolph Contreras |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part 77 Plaintiffs' Motion to Hold Defendant in Contempt for Failing to Comply with This Court's March 15, 2021 Order. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 10/4/2021. (lcrc3)
|
|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting in part and denying in part 72 Plaintiffs' Motion for an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 3/15/2021. (lcrc3)
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM OPINION granting 31 Defendants' motion to dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 37 Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment; granting in part and denying in part 39 Defendants' motion for summary judgment; denying 43 Plaintiffs' motion to compel. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 8/1/19. (lcrc1)
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM OPINION denying 8 Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction. See document for details. Signed by Judge Rudolph Contreras on 10/24/18. (lcrc1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
