BONILLA et al v. SIZZLING EXPRESS-COLUMBIA PLAZA, INC. et al
SANTANA HERNANDEZ BONILLA and RONNY CASTELLANOS PINEDA |
SIZZLING EXPRESS-COLUMBIA PLAZA, INC., YONG JIN KIM and SIZZLING EXPRESS-COLUMBIA PLAZA, INC. doing business as SIZZLING EXPRESS |
1:2018cv01520 |
June 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
11001 |
Royce C Lamberth |
Labor: Fair Standards |
15 U.S.C. ยง 2 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MEET AND CONFER STATEMENT. (Zelikovitz, Justin) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by YONG JIN KIM, SIZZLING EXPRESS-COLUMBIA PLAZA, INC..(Wilson, Albert) |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. YONG JIN KIM served on 7/5/2018, answer due 7/26/2018 (Zelikovitz, Justin) |
Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. SIZZLING EXPRESS-COLUMBIA PLAZA, INC. served on 7/5/2018, answer due 7/26/2018 (Zelikovitz, Justin) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to YONG JIN KIM, SIZZLING EXPRESS-COLUMBIA PLAZA, INC. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsb) |
Case Assigned to Judge Royce C. Lamberth . (zsb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5555998) filed by SANTANA HERNANDEZ BONILLA, RONNY CASTELLANOS PINEDA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons (2))(Zelikovitz, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.