KHOCHINSKY v. REPUBLIC OF POLAND
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER KHOCHINSKY
Defendant: REPUBLIC OF POLAND
Case Number: 1:2018cv01532
Filed: June 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Dabney L. Friedrich
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1605
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION regarding the defendant's 20 Motion to Vacate the Entry of Default; the defendant's 21 Motion to Dismiss; and the plaintiff's 22 Motion for Default Judgment. See text for details. Signed by Judge Dabney L. Friedrich on November 6, 2019. (lcdlf2)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KHOCHINSKY v. REPUBLIC OF POLAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER KHOCHINSKY
Represented By: Nicholas M. O'Donnell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: REPUBLIC OF POLAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?