AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT et al
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL |
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION |
1:2018cv01614 |
July 9, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Columbia |
Washington, DC Office |
11001 |
Amy Berman Jackson |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ENTERED IN ERROR.....SUMMONS (4) Issued Electronically as to U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zjd) Modified on 7/10/2018 (zmd). |
Filing 2 LCvR 7.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL (Magid, Creighton) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5576653) filed by AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons for Atty General, #3 Summons for CBP, #4 Summons for ICE, #5 Summons for US Atty DC, #6 Exhibit A, #7 Exhibit B, #8 Exhibit C, #9 Exhibit D, #10 Exhibit E)(Magid, Creighton) (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/9/2018) (zjd). |
Case Assigned to Judge Amy Berman Jackson. (zjd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.