AKHMETSHIN v. BROWDER

Plaintiff: RINAT AKHMETSHIN
Defendant: WILLIAM BROWDER
Case Number: 1:2018cv01638
Filed: July 12, 2018
Court: District Of Columbia District Court
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 11001
Presiding Judge: Emmet G Sullivan
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed#Document Text
July 12, 2018 Case Assigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. (zsb)
July 12, 2018 1 COMPLAINT against WILLIAM BROWDER with Jury Demand (Fee Status: Paid, Receipt No 0090-5584175, $400.00) filed by RINAT AKHMETSHIN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Sperduto, Kim) Modified on 7/12/2018 to add payment information.(ztnr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AKHMETSHIN v. BROWDER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WILLIAM BROWDER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RINAT AKHMETSHIN
Represented By: Kim Hoyt Sperduto
Represented By: Michael Gibaldi
Represented By: Michael Tremonte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?