DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
| DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION |
| DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR |
| 1:2018cv01665 |
| July 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| James E Boasberg |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Joint Status Report due by 10/15/2018. (znbn) |
MINUTE ORDER ADOPTING the parties' #9 Joint Status Report. The Court ORDERS that the parties shall file a further Joint Status Report on or before October 15, 2018. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 9/11/2018. (lcjeb1)
|
| Filing 9 Joint STATUS REPORT by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR. (Clark, Denise) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Joint Proposed Briefing Schedule due by 9/10/2018. (znbn) |
|
MINUTE ORDER: The Court ORDERS that the parties shall meet, confer, and submit a proposed joint briefing schedule by September 10, 2018. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 8/27/2018. (lcjeb1)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR.(Clark, Denise) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Denise M. Clark on behalf of UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR (Clark, Denise) |
| Filing 6 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 7/25/2018. ( Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 8/24/2018.), RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 7/25/18., RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR served on 7/25/2018 (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Guzman, Javier) |
| NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: Document No. re #4 NOTICE of Proof of Service needs to be refiled by counsel under the correct category. |
| Filing 5 LCvR 7.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION (Guzman, Javier) |
|
MINUTE ORDER GRANTING #3 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of TRAVIS ANNATOYN. So ORDERED by Judge James E. Boasberg on 8/3/2018. (lcjeb3)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Proof of Service by DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Guzman, Javier) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice :Attorney Name- Travis Annatoyn, :Firm- Democracy Forward Foundation, :Address- 1333 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20005. Phone No. - 202-448-9090. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0090-5617763. Fee Status: Fee Paid. by DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Guzman, Javier) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent) (zmd) |
| Case Assigned to Judge James E. Boasberg. (zmd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5588144) filed by DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Guzman, Javier) (Attachment 2 replaced on 7/17/2018) (zmd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
