GONZALEZ RAMOS v. ADR VANTAGE, INC.
Plaintiff: JOEY D. GONZALEZ RAMOS
Defendant: ADR VANTAGE, INC.
Case Number: 1:2018cv01690
Filed: July 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Columbia
Office: Washington, DC Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Amit P Mehta
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2018 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: Document No. re #7 MOTION for CM/ECF Password was entered in error as a duplicate entry to #6 .(jf)
September 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ENTERED IN ERROR.....MOTION for CM/ECF Password by JOEY D. GONZALEZ RAMOS (jf) Modified on 9/11/2018 (jf).
August 31, 2018 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER granting Plaintiff's #6 Motion for CM/ECF User Name and Password. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 08/31/2018. (lcapm1)
August 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER advising Plaintiff to respond by September 28, 2018, to Defendant's #4 Motion to Dismiss or risk dismissal of the case. See the attached Order for additional details. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 08/29/2018. (lcapm1)
August 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines: Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss due by 9/28/2018. (kh)
August 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by ADR VANTAGE, INC. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum Regarding Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit Index and Exhibits to Memorandum, #3 Text of Proposed Order Order Regarding Motion to Dismiss)(Dwyer, Anthony)
August 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for CM/ECF Password by JOEY D. GONZALEZ RAMOS (jf)
August 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ENTERED IN ERROR.....ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by ADR VANTAGE, INC..(Dwyer, Anthony) Modified on 8/24/2018 (jf).
August 24, 2018 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF CORRECTED DOCKET ENTRY: Document No. re #3 Answer to Complaint was entered in error at the request of counsel and will not be refiled.(jf)
August 15, 2018 Opinion or Order MINUTE ORDER denying Plaintiff's #2 Motion for CM/ECF Password. Plaintiff's Motion is denied without prejudice. The court directs Plaintiff to the specific requirements set forth in Local Civil Rule 5.4(b)(2). Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 08/15/2018. (lcapm1)
August 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for CM/ECF Password by JOEY D. GONZALEZ RAMOS (jf)
July 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ADR VANTAGE, INC. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 4616093686) with Jury Demand filed by JOEY D. GONZALEZ RAMOS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(jf)
July 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Summons (1) Issued as to ADR VANTAGE, INC. (jf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GONZALEZ RAMOS v. ADR VANTAGE, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOEY D. GONZALEZ RAMOS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ADR VANTAGE, INC.
Represented By: Anthony Daniel Dwyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?