GASTON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
| FAITH GASTON and B. G. |
| DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
| 1:2018cv01703 |
| July 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| Richard J Leon |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.(Porter, Veronica) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the District of Columbia Attorney General. Date of Service Upon District of Columbia Attorney General 8/1/2018. Answer due for ALL D.C. DEFENDANTS by 8/22/2018. (Jones, Robert) |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on the Mayor of the District of Columbia. Date of Service Upon the Mayor for the District of Columbia on 8/1/2018. (Jones, Robert) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (2) Issued Electronically as to District of Columbia Attorney General, and the District of Columbia Mayor. (Attachments: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsth) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5597954) filed by Faith Gaston, B. G.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Jones, Robert) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard J. Leon. (zsth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
