STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al
| DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF WASHINGTON, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF DELAWARE, COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF OREGON, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and STATE OF CALIFORNIA |
| U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Secretary of Labor R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR |
| 1:2018cv01747 |
| July 26, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia |
| Washington, DC Office |
| 11001 |
| John D Bates |
| Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0706 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (zmd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0090-5606186) filed by COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF WASHINGTON, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, STATE OF DELAWARE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Colangelo, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the District Of Columbia District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
